A question on illegal immigration.

I’m confused by the left’s stance on this.

I get that the goal of amnesty for immigrants currently in the country is because of a desire to be compassionate and avoid the pain (both political and real) of splitting up communities.

But, why the opposition to stopping illegal immigration (e.g. “the wall”)?

Is it:

1. Because the costs of stopping it outweigh the benefits of being able to filter all immigrants?

2. They are actually opposed to filtering immigrants and prefer moving towards open borders.

3. They are concerned that if illegal immigration stops legal immigration limits will not be increased. This would lead to less immigrants in the country which is bad.

Theoretically there should be an impenetrable border and then we decide who does or doesn’t get to live in the country.

Then you would also increase the # of immigrants accepted each year.

Your thoughts?

^Day 121/90 158 words

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s